Cuneiform 103 · Chapter 10
Warm-up · 6 quick retrievals from earlier chapters
The River decides
Law 1 dealt with a murder charge that could not be proven; the court’s answer was to kill the accuser. Law 2 asks a harder question — what if the charge is sorcery, where no witness can exist? — and hands the case to a judge no one can bribe.
Batch eleven
| Sign | Name | Key | Reads | Means | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 𒇉 | ENGUR | the deep | [id] | the sweet waters under the earth | Enki's deep; with the water-sign: Id, the River |
| 𒁍 | BU | tear | [bu/pu] | to tear away in the lists | the pu of kišpū, "sorcery" — named, never proven |
| 𒅅 | IG | door | [ig/ik/iq] | the door | the door-sign at the law's turn |
| 𒂍 | E2 | house | [bītum] | — | veteran — 101's house-sign: bītum |
| 𒅆 | IGI | eye | [lim] | — | veteran — the ši-sign gains lim |
| 𒍪 | ZU | know | [su] | — | veteran — 102's knowing-sign, now su |
A god you can wade into
The stele writes the River as 𒀭𒀀𒇉 — the divine determinative, then water, then the deep — and the last two signs are read as ONE word: Id, the River’s name. Neither sign is sounded on its own; water-plus-deep IS the name, a picture of a river speaking as a river.
So the one writing wears three labels, and they never compete — hold the chain once and every line below reads itself:
- ENGUR is the deep-sign’s NAME on the shelf — its identity, never spoken in this course;
- ID2 is how the sign lists FILE the pair 𒀀𒇉 — a word-sign in capitals with its little index, the same habit as E2;1
- Id is what your mouth says: the god’s name, declined like any noun — and the voice is what a reading line prints, in chapter 03’s green capitals: ID, on green-marked signs.
Name, spelling, voice — in that order, every time the River flows through a line. This is the ordeal: the accused walks into the god and the god gives a verdict no appeal can touch. Every sign of the phrase is now yours, and so is the whole law.
Law 2, first half: the charge unproven
urn:nabu:cdli:p464358:a:311–:a:323
· license: attribution.
The new machinery, item by item:
- kišpī / kišpū — “sorcery”: a noun that only exists in the plural, like chapter 08’s nišū — first as object (-ī), then as subject (-ū) of…
- nadû — “(is) laid”: the stative again (chapter 08), now masculine plural — charges lie on a man the way a burden does.
- Id — the divine River: on the page {d}ID2, the determinative and then 𒀀𒇉, water-plus-deep spoken as one name — and declined like any noun. The law walks a man into a god.
- išalliamma — “he shall plunge, and”: the durative of plunging, with the hither -am you met on šūbilam in chapter 09 — the motion aimed at the river, then -ma chaining the verdict.
- iktašassu — “it has overwhelmed him”: the overwhelming-verb with the -t- infix chapter 09 named — here it marks the deed as done and decisive; the grammars call this shape the perfect. The final -šu, “him,” melts against the verb into -ssu.
- bīssu itabbal — “he shall carry off his estate”: E2, the house-sign from 101, as a sumerogram wearing an Akkadian suffix — bītum + -šu → bīssu, the same melting as above.
Law 2, second half: the mirror
Now the stele turns the coin over. One sign in this half is not yet yours — the box marks it, and it falls four chapters on:
urn:nabu:cdli:p464358:a:324–:a:334
· license: attribution.
The mirror’s own pieces:
- šuāti — “that (man)”: the pointing word, riding after its noun in the accusative.
- ūtebbibaššuma — “has cleared him”: the purifying-verb, doubled-middle build with the -t- infix — a chapter 09 D at full formality. Its second sign is the one remaining box.
- ištalmam — “he has come out safe”: šalāmum, “to be whole,” in the perfect — the same root the whole Near East still greets with.
- bīt mubbirīšu — “the estate of his accuser”: the construct chain of chapter 03, built on the doer-noun of chapter 06.
Read the whole law once more, aloud, both halves. A man walks into a god carrying an unprovable accusation, and walks out — one way or the other — with the case closed. Four thousand years on, the law still knows this problem; it has simply run out of rivers.
Drill before you go on
- Write 𒇉, 𒁍, 𒅅 from memory; say bu and ig — and for the deep-sign say nothing alone: put water before it and say Id.
- Spell the River — determinative, water, deep — and say its Akkadian name.
- iktašassu and ištalmam share a shape. What does the -ta- say that a plain preterite would not?
- Who takes whose estate, in which verdict? Answer from the endings, not from memory.
Next: the lines everyone quotes — an eye for an eye, read from the original.
-
The sign lists file this pair-value both ways — id2 and i7 name the same writing, water + deep — and the corpus transliteration of the stele uses the latter (
{d}i7, raw ATF). This course files the pair as ID2 in prose and codex; the reading lines print the voice itself, green ID, so that the written word and the spoken word agree. ↩